Measuring Risk-based Human Rights Due Diligence: Sourcing and labour outcome metrics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201226265Keywords:
human rights, risk-based due diligence, labour practices, global supply chains, CSDDDAbstract
In contrast to existing guidance frameworks for due diligence that focus on global firms describing their programmes (inputs), in this article, we argue that quantitative data on labour outcomes are required to hold global firms to account for human rights harms in their supply chains. We present twenty-five metrics that measure both lead firm sourcing practices and supplier firm labour rights and working conditions. We argue that these metrics are useful for regulators to assess how lead firms covered under due diligence legislation are addressing human rights harms in their supply chains. In addition, they are particularly useful to lead firms themselves in order to assess the level and salience of risks.
Metrics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anti-Trafficking Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Anti-Trafficking Review has a policy of licensing under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). Under the CC-BY license, the public is free to share, adapt, and make commercial use of the work. To protect our work and that of our authors, however, users must always give proper attribution to the author(s) and the Anti-Trafficking Review (i.e. with a complete bibliographic citation and link to the Anti-Trafficking Review website and/or DOI).
The Anti-Trafficking Review promotes the sharing of information, and we therefore encourage the reproduction and onward dissemination of articles published with us.
